Larey McLaren for Alderwood Water District
Commissioner, Pos. 3 (non-partisan)

The Enterprise Questionnaire - Primary 2005 ( home )

  1. What should the district do to keep up with growth?

Employing integrated resource planning and utilizing leading-edge technologies are key elements of providing high-quality service today. Conservation alone will not prepare us for potential future resource demands - conservation is only part of the solution. We must operate effectively - “do the right thing”; and maximize efficiency - “do things right.” The Clearview Projects are good examples of doing the right thing. They have provided a boost to available resources, particularly in the eastern area of the District, by demonstrating that cooperative projects with neighboring purveyors can be effective.  Continued development and implementation of Best Management Practices will improve efficiency.

  1. Can the district keep up with growth without increasing rates?

Rate increases are a function of maintenance and operations expense. While the recent signing of a long-term water supply contract with the City of Everett helps stabilize commodity expenditures, other factors contribute to costs. Higher outlays for maintenance equipment, conveyance materials and labor must be mitigated. “Growth pays for growth” is a critical policy for capital projects.

On the sewer side, most of our wastewater is treated by King County/METRO and our fate is largely dependent on the Brightwater project. We must persevere to minimize any adverse impact of political competition between King County and Snohomish County on Alderwood ratepayers.

  1. What is the best way to proceed with expanding the Picnic Point treatment plant?

In my previous term as Commissioner I convinced the Board to increase the scope of options considered during the Sewer Comprehensive Plan Review process. While the approach ultimately selected was not from the expanded list, the additional research strengthened the analysis. Many of the challenges facing us today stem from shortsighted policy decisions made 40 years ago. We can not afford to sacrifice long-term stability on the altar of expediency. Utilization of sustainable, cost effective technology with an eye to future expansion is crucial and we must explore every option. I believe we must continue to raise the performance standard.

  1. Do you believe the district needs to cut its budget and expenses? Why or why not?

An organization of any kind that is operated without waste is rare indeed, so the knee-jerk response is, “Yes.” However, isn’t the first question to ask “Is the district spending ratepayer money on the activities necessary to provide high-quality water resources to customers?”  Are AWD rates competitive with peers? History of rate increases? Are budgets prepared with supporting documentation? Are expenses budgeted consistent with other organizations of similar size/scope? Are actuals within budget limits? If not, why not? Are procedures in place for review and revision? Are we solvent? Answers to these questions will identify the need for cuts.